Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00677
Original file (PD 2014 00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD -20 1 4 - 00677
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS   BOARD DATE: 2014 1024
Separation Date: 20071031


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered indivi dual (CI) was an active duty PFC /E-2 ( 9971/Basic Marine ) medically separated for a left shoulder injury. The shoulder could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her M ilitary Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a temporary U3 profile by the Army , as she was attending her Basic Militar y Occupational Specialty Course at Ft Leonard Wood, and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The shoulder condition characterized as “other joint derangement, not elsewhere classified, shoulder region , ” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The I nformal PEB and a follow-up R econsideration PEB both adjudicated “left shoulder multidirectional instability” as unfitting, but a preexisting condition. The CI non-concurred with both findings and requested a Formal PEB (FPEB) . The FPEB adjudicated the same condition, but rated it at 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI concurred with the FPEB and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION : “Left shoulder injury continues to incapacitate daily activities needed for a fully functional, normal, and healthy life. Migraines occur and disrupt more than 50% of each week disrupting and often destroying school and work success.”


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting shoulder condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions, to include the contended migraines, are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR).

invalid font number 31502
RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20070814
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Shoulder Multi-Directional Instability 5202 10% Left Shoulder, S/P Operative Labrum Tear, w/Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendonitis 5024 10%* 20080219
Other x 0
 Other x 2 20080219
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20080821 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
* VARD of 20100908 updated shoulder condition, and backdated to day after separation.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

 Left Shoulder Multi-Directional Instability Condition . There were two goniometric range - of - motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Left Shoulder ROM (Degrees) MEB NARSUM 7. 5 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 4 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (180 Normal) 150 150
Abduction (180) 135 120
Comments : Right hand dominant Pos. evidence of instability Pos. painful motion & crepitus; Pos. tenderness to palpation; No Deluca criteria
§4.71a Rating 20% (PEB 10 % ) 10 %
invalid font number 31502
The CI had a history of left posterior shoulder dislocations which required surgery o n 23   November 2004 and existed prior to service ( EPTS ) . She did quite well until she was in basic training and sustained two more left shoulder dislocations. She was seen in the emergency room ( ER ) for left shoulder pain after doing pushups with physical exam findings of positive Hawkins sign (tendon impingement) and tenderness to palpation (TTP). Throughout 2006, the CI followed with p rimary c are and p hysical t herapy (PT) for left shoulder anterior TTP, muscle atrophy and pain. The CI underwent a left shoulder arthrogram . A left shoulder magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a possible tear of the glenohumeral ligament and bicep tendon as well as a thickened middle glenohumeral ligament . The o rthopedist noted chronic constant left shoulder pain which was worse with subluxations due to instability. The physical exam findings were mild muscle atrophy; TTP along the bicipital tendon and lateral aspect of the acromion posteriorly and brisk biceps and triceps reflexes. The o rthopedist diagnosed chronic left shoulder pain associated with recurrent instability. The CI was given a temporary U3 profile for left shoulder pain; however , there wer e no associated limited duties . The CI underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy with debridement of the shoulder labrum on 24 January 2007. Throughout 2007, the CI was treated by PT for chronic left shoulder pain. The MEB NARSUM exam approximately 7 months prior to separation documented that although the CI felt her shoulder was more stable, she still had pain and feelings of shoulder instability. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were summarized above.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 3 months after separation documented that the CI continued to have infrequent left shoulder dislocations approximately six times per year with shoulder pain when working overhead, sleeping on her left side and doing heavy lifting. She also reported feelings of grinding and popping, and feelings of weakness and looseness. The VA C&P physical exam findings were summarized in the chart above.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB and reconsideration PEB both coded the l eft s houlder m ulti- d irectional i nstability condition as h umerus, other impairment of and identified the shoulder as a pre-existing condition. T he FPEB document indicate d that there was no reduction in the disability rating for the EPTS condition and assigned a 10% rating . The Board presumes that there was an oversight on the FPEB document as a review of the rating criteria for 5202 shows a minimum rating of 20%. The VA coded the l eft s houlder, status post o perative l abrum t ear, with c hronic r otator c uff t endonitis condition as 5024 ( t enosynovitis ), rated at 10%. The CI was right- hand dominant. All notes in the treatment record proximate to separation documented infrequent left shoulder dislocation and guarding . The MEB examiner documented limited ROM and all testing demonstrated left shoulder instability with feelings of possible shoulder dislocation with extremes of activities and any strenuous activity to include lifting, pulling or pushing. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the l eft s houlder m ulti- d irectional i nstability condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the l eft s houlder m ulti- d irectional i nstability condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20 %, coded 5202 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Shoulder Multi-Directional Instability 5202 2 0%
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140131 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
        
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) PDBR ltr dtd 24 Apr 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 24 Apr 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(d) PDBR ltr dtd 8 Jan 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(e) PDBR ltr dtd 14 Apr 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(f) PDBR ltr dtd 21 Apr 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(g) PDBR ltr dtd 7 Apr 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (g).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

d. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

e. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

f. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are completed.



         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01982

    Original file (PD 2014 01982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00920

    Original file (PD 2014 00920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20050923 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the recurrent right shoulder instability condition, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01526

    Original file (PD-2013-01526.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left shoulder pain condition, characterized as “recurrent left shoulder instability status post (s/p) arthroscopic stabilization” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The Informal PEBadjudicated the “recurrent left shoulder instability” as unfitting, and rated 10%,with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Motor strength was slightly reduced in the left arm from pain and signs of forward instability,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01187

    Original file (PD 2013 01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Pain, History of Dislocation5202-502410%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060921 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02818

    Original file (PD-2013-02818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050310 The orthopedic MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination on 10 November 2004, reported continued right shoulder instability and subluxation with extension, abduction and overhead activity. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00823

    Original file (PD2012-00823.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the MEB physical exam DD Form 2808, dated 05 November 2001, the examiner recorded “B shoulder subluxation, popping B shoulder, + sulcus sign L>R, N/V intact distally.” In the NARSUM, 4 months prior to separation, the examiner noted “he has minimal pain from this, but pretty much every time he tries to adduct, externally rotate the arms, he dislocates the shoulders. The examiner opined “Bilateral shoulder joint laxity, right greater than left, with history of recurrent, uncomplicated,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01932

    Original file (PD-2013-01932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051115 The Board first considered examination probative value noting “passive” ROM performed at the NARSUM and therefore, not in compliance with VASRD criteria. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01366

    Original file (PD-2013-01366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-500310%Residuals of Remote Left Shoulder Injury; S/P Reconstruction520120%20100420Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 520100420 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100614 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board notes the earliest VA evaluation was over 5 years after the date of separation. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01420

    Original file (PD-2013-01420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Shoulder Condition . Physical Disability Board of Review XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10%) effective date of discharge.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01965

    Original file (PD-2013-01965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting s/p left ACL reconstruction condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Members deliberated if this negatively impacted their ability to render a fair assessment and agreed that the available evidence was sufficiently probative; evidence presumed not accomplished would not materially affect the Board’s final recommendation.The PEB coded the left knee Grade II chondromalacia patellae s/pleft...